翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Regular temperament
・ Regular tree grammar
・ Regular tuning
・ Regular Urban Survivors
・ Regular way contracts
・ RegularChains
・ Regulares
・ Regularis Concordia
・ Regularis Concordia (Winchester)
・ Regularity rally
・ Regularity theorem
・ Regularity theorem for Lebesgue measure
・ Regularization
・ Regularization (linguistics)
・ Regularization (mathematics)
Regularization (physics)
・ Regularization by spectral filtering
・ Regularization perspectives on support vector machines
・ Regularized canonical correlation analysis
・ Regularized Inglish
・ Regularized meshless method
・ Regulate
・ Regulate (song)
・ Regulate the Chemicals
・ Regulate... G Funk Era, Pt. II
・ Regulate...G Funk Era
・ Regulated Area (No 2)
・ Regulated function
・ Regulated Industries and Utilities Committee (Georgia Senate)
・ Regulated Industries Committee (Georgia House)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Regularization (physics) : ウィキペディア英語版
Regularization (physics)

In physics, especially quantum field theory, regularization is a method of dealing with infinite, divergent, and non-sensical expressions by introducing an auxiliary concept of a regulator (for example, the minimal distance \epsilon in space which is useful if the divergences arise from short-distance physical effects). The correct physical result is obtained in the limit in which the regulator goes away (in our example, \epsilon\to 0), but the virtue of the regulator is that for its finite value, the result is finite.
However, the result usually includes terms proportional to expressions like 1/ \epsilon which are not well-defined in the limit \epsilon\to 0. Regularization is the first step towards obtaining a completely finite and meaningful result; in quantum field theory it must be usually followed by a related, but independent technique called renormalization. Renormalization is based on the requirement that some physical quantities — expressed by seemingly divergent expressions such as 1/ \epsilon — are equal to the observed values. Such a constraint allows one to calculate a finite value for many other quantities that looked divergent.
The existence of a limit as ε goes to zero and the independence of the final result from the regulator are nontrivial facts. The underlying reason for them lies in universality as shown by Kenneth Wilson and Leo Kadanoff and the existence of a second order phase transition. Sometimes, taking the limit as ε goes to zero is not possible. This is the case when we have a Landau pole and for nonrenormalizable couplings like the Fermi interaction. However, even for these two examples, if the regulator only gives reasonable results for \epsilon \gg 1/\Lambda and we are working with scales of the order of 1/\Lambda', regulators with 1/\Lambda \ll \epsilon \ll 1/\Lambda' still give pretty accurate approximations. The physical reason why we can't take the limit of ε going to zero is the existence of new physics below Λ.
It is not always possible to define a regularization such that the limit of ε going to zero is independent of the regularization. In this case, one says that the theory contains an anomaly. Anomalous theories have been studied in great detail and are often founded on the celebrated Atiyah–Singer index theorem or variations thereof (see, for example, the chiral anomaly).
Specific types of regularization include
*Dimensional regularization〔't Hooft, Veltman M.: ''Regularization and renormalization of gauge fields'', Nucl. Phys. B44 (1972), p.189–213.〕
*Pauli–Villars regularization
*Lattice regularization
*Zeta function regularization
*Causal regularization〔Scharf, G.: ''Finite Quantum Electrodynamics: The Causal Approach'', Springer 1995.〕
*Hadamard regularization
==Realistic regularization==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Regularization (physics)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.